No posts published in this language yet
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.
Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7:00:00 PM UTC
Request Open
2023 ° 02(05) ° 11-07
https://www.wikipt.org/tphysicsletters
DOI: 10.1490/466489.476tpl
We would like to thank J. P. Pekola and I. Maasilta for useful comments on the manuscript. T. K. would like to acknowledge financial support from the Emil Aaltonen foundation. The contribution of G.S.P. was supported by the Academy of Finland (Acad. Res. Fellowship 00857, and projects 129896, 118122, and 135135).
Changeover the Schrödinger Equation
This option will drive you towards only the selected publication. If you want to save money then choose the full access plan from the right side.
Get access to entire database
This option will unlock the entire database of us to you without any limitations for a specific time period.
This offer is limited to 100000 clients if you make delay further, the offer slots will be booked soon. Afterwards, the prices will be 50% hiked.
The description of transport phenomena in devices consisting of arrays of tunnel junctions, and the experimental confirmation of these predictions is one of the great successes of mesoscopic physics. The aim of this paper is to give a self-consistent review of sequential transport processes in such devices, based on the so-called ”orthodox” model. We calculate numerically the current-voltage (I–V ) curves, the conductance versus bias voltage (G–V ) curves, and the associated thermal transport in symmetric and asymmetric two-junction arrays such as Coulomb-blockade thermometers (CBTs), superconducting-insulator-normal-insulator-superconducting (SINIS) structures, and superconducting single-electron transistors (SETs). We investigate the behavior of these systems at the singularity-matching bias points, the dependence of microrefrigeration effects on the charging energy of the island, and the effect of a finite superconducting gap on Coulomb-blockade thermometry.
Quasiparticle transport processes across metallic junctions play a fundamental role in the functioning of many devices used nowadays in mesoscopic physics. One such device is the single electron transistor (SET), invented and fabricated almost two decades ago [1], which has found remarkable applications as ultrasensitive charge detector [2] and as amplifier operating at the quantum limit [3]. In the emerging field of quantum computing the superconducting SET has been proposed and used as a quantum bit [4]. With advancements in lithography techniques, this device can be fully suspended [5], thus providing a new avenue for nanoelectromechanics. Similar devices are currently used (in practice arrays with several junctions turn out to provide a larger signal-to-noise ratio) as Coulomb blockade (CBT) primary thermometers [6]. Also, superconducting double-junction systems with appropriate bias can be operated as microcoolers [7]. The functioning of these three classes of devices is based on the interplay between two out of the three relevant energy scales: the superconducting gap, the charging energy, and the temperature. For example, in the case of microcoolers, the temperature and the gap are finite, and the charging energy is typically zero. A natural question to raise is then what happens if the charging energy is no longer negligible, for example if one wishes to miniaturize further these devices. In contradistinction, for CBTs the charging energy and the temperature are important, and the superconducting gap is a nuisance. A solution is to suppress the gap by using external magnetic fields, an idea which makes these temperature sensors more bulky and risky to use near magnetic-field sensitive components. Therefore, understanding the corrections introduced by the superconducting gap could provide an interesting alternative route, although, with present technology, the level of control required of the gap value could be very difficult to achieve. Finally, electrometers and superconducting SETs are operated at low temperatures, with the charging energy and the gap being dominant. However, large charging energies are not always easy to obtain for some materials due to technological limitations, while achieving effective very low electronic temperatures is limited by various nonequilibrium processes. In this article we present a unified treatment of these three devices by solving the transport problem in the most general case, when all three energy scales are present. Our goal is to give an eye guidance for the experimentalist working in the field, showing what are the main characteristics visible in the I–V s and G–V s, resulting from sequential tunneling. Both the electrical and the thermal transport are calculated in the framework of a generalized so-called ”orthodox” theory, which includes the superconducting gap. For completeness, we offer a self-consistent review of this theory, which has become nowadays the standard model for describing sequential quasiparticle transport processes in these devices. We ignore Josephson effects which, for the purpose of this analysis just add certain well-known
We have presented the theory of tunneling in metallic and superconducting two-junction arrays such as single electron transistors, together with a number of applications. All three energy scales, the charging energy, the superconducting gap, and the temperature, are considered and their role is thoroughly discussed. For example, we examined how a finite superconducting gap affects the Coulomb-blockade based thermometry, the effect of singularity-matching peaks in the current-voltage and conductance-voltage characteristics of superconducting single-electron transistors, and we looked at the effect of charging energy in cooling devices. With the development of the field of nanotechnology, such devices could emerge as very useful tools for high-precision measurements of nano-structured materials and objects at low temperatures.
[1] D. V. Averin and K. K. Likharev, J. Low Temp. Phys. 62, 345 (1986); T. A. Fulton and G. J. Dolan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 109 (1987). [2] R. J. Schoelkopf, P. Wahlgren, A. A. Kozhevnikov, P. Delsing, and D. E. Prober, Science 280, 1238 (1998); M. A. Sillanp¨a¨ , L. Roschier, and P. J. Hakonen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 066805 (2004). [3] M. H. Devoret, R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 406, 1039 (2000). [4] Y. Nakamura, Y. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Nature, 398, 786 (1999); Yu. Makhlin, G. Sch¨on, and A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001); D. Vion et. al., Science 296, 886 (2002); Y. Nakamura, Yu. A. Paskin, T. Yamamoto, and J. S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047901 (2002); Yu. A. Paskin et. al., Nature 421, 823 (2003); T. Yamamoto et. al., Nature 425, 941 (2003); T. Duty, D. Gunnarsson, K. Bladh, and P. Delsing, Phys. Rev. B 69 132504 (2004); J.Q. You and F. Nori, Physics Today 58, 42 (2005); G. S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. B 74, 140504(R) (2006). G. S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180406 (2006); J. Li, K. Chalapat, and G. S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064503 (2008); J. Li and G.S. Paraoanu, New J. Phys. 11, 113020 (2009). [5] G. S. Paraoanu and A. M. Halvari, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 093101 (2005); T. F. Li et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 033107 (2007). [6] J. P. Pekola, K. P. Hirvi, J. P. Kauppinen, and M. A. Paalanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2903 (1994); K. P. Hirvi, J. P. Kauppinen, A. N. Korotkov, M. A. Paalanen, and J. P. Pekola, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2096 (1995); J. P. Kauppinen and J. P. Pekola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3889 (1996); Sh. Farhangfar, K. P. Hirvi, J.P. Kauppinen, J. P. Pekola, J. J. Toppari, D. V. Averin, and A. N. Korotkov, J. Low Temp. Phys. 108, 191 (1997); J. P. Pekola, J. J. Toppari, J. P. Kauppinen, K. M. Kinnunen, A. J. Manninen, and A. G. M. Jansen, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5582 (1998); J. P. Kauppinen, K. T. Loberg, A. J. Manninen, J. P. Pekola, and R. V. Voutilainen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 4166 (1998). [7] M. M. Leivo, J. P. Pekola, and D. V. Averin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1996 (1996); J. P. Pekola, F. Giazotto, and O.-P. Saira, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 037201 (2007); O.-P. Saira, M. Meschke, F. Giazotto, A. M. Savin, M. Mottonen, J. P. Pekola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 027203 (2007). [8] A. B. Zorin, S. V. Lotkhov, H. Zangerle, and J. Niemeyer, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 2665 (2000); R. Dolata, H. Sch